just in case you’re looking for your daily dose of what the fuck is this shit, here’s a website for you:
i still have some hope that this is actually a parody and not an actual website because what the fuck
here are some excerpts
There’s nothing “not nice” about wanting her body. As long as she thinks it’s secondary to being interested in who she is.
RS, How to Be a ‘Nice Guy’ and Still Get Laid, or just How to Be a Nice Guy
8. She resembles her mother and her mother is obese and ugly. Like mother like daughter genetically speaking. Expect a scary nightmare to occur in the future. A very scary one.
The Prince, 11 Warning Signs a Woman Isn’t Worth Your Time, or 11 Reasons To Not Date Me
I get results when I take control. It is instant death when you hand over “control” to a woman.
My secret is to give women “intermittent reinforcement.” This actually is a psychological phenomenon commonly documented in experiments involving rats.
Doug, Intermittent Reinforcement, or Women Are Actually Rats
Cats don’t take crap.
If his owner maltreats him, oftentimes he’ll leave her and become a stray. He knows that there are other people who can treat him better! Likewise, if the woman punishes him for doing certain things. He ain’t gonna let that woman boss HIM around!
BGMan, Why Cats Attract Women and You Don’t, or Attempting to Justify Why She Likes Her Cat More Than She Likes Me
THERE ARE 458 ~TIPS~ LIKE THESE
ALL WRITTEN BY DIFFERENT GUYS
#so that’s what all those women eating salad were laughing about
I actually have no issue with men’s rights activists. And yes, I think by this point I do consider myself a feminist. Allow me to explain:
As most feminists point out, we live in a somewhat patriarchal society. Your actions are expected to be different based on your gender. This usually and primarily disadvantages women - the pay gap, the fact that a woman can often be considered a “quota hire”, the general expectation of moodiness and frequent incompetence etc etc.
However, the system is such that men who are deemed to be doing ‘feminine’ jobs are almost as derided as women in ‘masculine’ ones - male nurses, primary school teachers etc. Men are rarely given custody when it comes to parental seperation and so on.
It comes into the rape discussion as well: take the common hypothetical scenario that a woman is walking home, blind drunk, her clothes hanging off her. The assumption that a man almost can’t help but rape her in that situation is a terribly unfair one for both parties.
Far more sensible than talking about men’s rights and women’s rights (which usually end up antagonistic) is a discussion on gender equality. In the modern era, gender should be irrelevant. And laughing at men who point out that they are sometimes treated poorly just undermines your own argument - that there is a difference in the ways the various genders are treated that should simply not exist.
Seriously, if all these activists stopped yelling / laughing at each other, and actually worked together to eradicate any kind of gender prejudice, then a lot more would get done.
(bolded for emphasis)
oooooooook
- are you really comparing the unfairness of being raped to the unfairness of people’s belief that men are not responsible for rape? because that’s… what you just did. you conflated the two in a sentence. you know what else is ‘terribly unfair’? that belief that men can’t control themselves? it’s not hurting men. it’s what allows men to rape women without social or legal consequences. it’s what makes rape a woman’s fault.
- the reason ‘women’s rights’ ends in antagonism is because challenges against the status quo — men’s privilege — are met with fierce resistance, hatred, harassment, often death threats. it happens with every privileged group, but the outcry of the religious right against movements toward religious freedom stands out: the removal of privilege from a group is mistaken for ‘oppression’ and a societal attack, when in reality they’re only losing their dominance and privilege over other groups. you cannot argue that by advocating for having rights, women are equally to blame for ‘conflict’ as the men who already oppress and lash back at them. that is some fucked up logic and some apologetic bullshit.
- patriarchy and misogyny hurts men too. that’s understood. that does not mean that men are not privileged over women. that does not mean that men somehow don’t have rights, or are subject to oppression from women. it means that men are defined in exclusion to and avoidance from the horror of femininity, and men who deviate and verge too close to the feminine are punished — because ‘feminine’ is the worst thing it’s possible to be. hatred of women that also implicates men does not somehow stop being misogyny.
- saying that we have to fight for ‘gender equality’ instead of ‘women’s rights’ is a deliberate obfuscation. ‘gender equality’ means attaining women’s rights. men already have them. by eliminating categorical oppression against women, you would eliminate incidental harm against men caused by that oppression.
- men’s rights activists are a joke because they perceive the removal of their own privilege as oppression and ‘fight’ that ‘oppression’ by further oppressing, attacking, and dehumanizing women, who actually are societally oppressed.
that’s it
that’s the rotting corpse of ‘men’s rights’
someone let me know if it starts moving
‘gender equality’ means attaining women’s rights. men already have them.
^ this is a pretty important point that a lot of people seem to miss. same goes for any other kind of equality.
I think that yes there are problems with how women are treated. There are problems with how men are treated. I agree with pretty much everything above in an odd way.
In the case of custody in divorces which was brought up, I think it is unfair that the mother is always given higher consideration. As someone who was explicitly hurt, left to neglect, and put into a dangerous environment because the courts chose my mother over my father as the competent parent I understand what lil miss Choc is saying. Sometimes, a man will be a more confident care giver than a woman. and that is an okay thing to happen! We are all human beings who have flaws and who fuck up. Sometimes, one parent is more competent or stable for a child and it really doesn’t matter whether it’s the man or the woman.
I also think that women do face a lot of hardships in a patriarchal society. We have reason to be afraid when we walk down the streets at night and that is wrong. however, it’s also harmful to men when they are constantly painted in a terrible light. It leads to more fear and hightens tension on both sides of the issue. Men’s right’s are ages ahead of women’s, yes, but we’re working to close the gap, and to do so we have to work together as people. Putting any other group will not give a slighted group more leverage, it will just create two slighted groups.
Equality will come someday. I really think it will. Women have to continue to raise their voices and men have to listen. Men have to voice concerns, and women have to try and compromise as well. Equality is about compromise and if either group is painted as a hairy raping man beast or a bleeding vagina femnazi, we’ll forever be trapped in conflict.
:I
The problem with this line of thought, as I understand, is that literally every single problem one has to face because they are a man stems from the idea that men need to not be women. A man doing something that is perceived as girly is discriminated against because a girl is the worst thing a man could be.
This really perverse idea hurts men sometimes, yeah (you are a disgrace if you ever take any interest in “girl things”), but the core of the problem is women (and their “girl things”) being put in an inferior position in the first place.
If gender equality actually existed, and being a girl wasn’t such a terrible thing, then hey, maybe men who like girl things wouldn’t be discriminated against either, because girl things would be pretty cool too. From trivial things like wearing pink to serious things like being able to raise your own children.
#so that’s what all those women eating salad were laughing about
I actually have no issue with men’s rights activists. And yes, I think by this point I do consider myself a feminist. Allow me to explain:
As most feminists point out, we live in a somewhat patriarchal society. Your actions are expected to be different based on your gender. This usually and primarily disadvantages women - the pay gap, the fact that a woman can often be considered a “quota hire”, the general expectation of moodiness and frequent incompetence etc etc.
However, the system is such that men who are deemed to be doing ‘feminine’ jobs are almost as derided as women in ‘masculine’ ones - male nurses, primary school teachers etc. Men are rarely given custody when it comes to parental seperation and so on.
It comes into the rape discussion as well: take the common hypothetical scenario that a woman is walking home, blind drunk, her clothes hanging off her. The assumption that a man almost can’t help but rape her in that situation is a terribly unfair one for both parties.
Far more sensible than talking about men’s rights and women’s rights (which usually end up antagonistic) is a discussion on gender equality. In the modern era, gender should be irrelevant. And laughing at men who point out that they are sometimes treated poorly just undermines your own argument - that there is a difference in the ways the various genders are treated that should simply not exist.
Seriously, if all these activists stopped yelling / laughing at each other, and actually worked together to eradicate any kind of gender prejudice, then a lot more would get done.
(bolded for emphasis)
oooooooook
- are you really comparing the unfairness of being raped to the unfairness of people’s belief that men are not responsible for rape? because that’s… what you just did. you conflated the two in a sentence. you know what else is ‘terribly unfair’? that belief that men can’t control themselves? it’s not hurting men. it’s what allows men to rape women without social or legal consequences. it’s what makes rape a woman’s fault.
- the reason ‘women’s rights’ ends in antagonism is because challenges against the status quo — men’s privilege — are met with fierce resistance, hatred, harassment, often death threats. it happens with every privileged group, but the outcry of the religious right against movements toward religious freedom stands out: the removal of privilege from a group is mistaken for ‘oppression’ and a societal attack, when in reality they’re only losing their dominance and privilege over other groups. you cannot argue that by advocating for having rights, women are equally to blame for ‘conflict’ as the men who already oppress and lash back at them. that is some fucked up logic and some apologetic bullshit.
- patriarchy and misogyny hurts men too. that’s understood. that does not mean that men are not privileged over women. that does not mean that men somehow don’t have rights, or are subject to oppression from women. it means that men are defined in exclusion to and avoidance from the horror of femininity, and men who deviate and verge too close to the feminine are punished — because ‘feminine’ is the worst thing it’s possible to be. hatred of women that also implicates men does not somehow stop being misogyny.
- saying that we have to fight for ‘gender equality’ instead of ‘women’s rights’ is a deliberate obfuscation. ‘gender equality’ means attaining women’s rights. men already have them. by eliminating categorical oppression against women, you would eliminate incidental harm against men caused by that oppression.
- men’s rights activists are a joke because they perceive the removal of their own privilege as oppression and ‘fight’ that ‘oppression’ by further oppressing, attacking, and dehumanizing women, who actually are societally oppressed.
that’s it
that’s the rotting corpse of ‘men’s rights’
someone let me know if it starts moving
‘gender equality’ means attaining women’s rights. men already have them.
^ this is a pretty important point that a lot of people seem to miss. same goes for any other kind of equality.
